Preparing experts who speak for a purpose, cause or field of expertise to be clear, credible and understood under pressure. That matters most when the questions are difficult and the media frame is not theirs to control.
Trusted by
Media training prepares you for the moment a reporter is asking questions and you are answering on the record. It is not public-speaking or presentation coaching. A prepared spokesperson knows what matters most, how to say it clearly in limited time, and how to respond when the question is not the one they expected.
Traditional media training often teaches bridging: acknowledge the difficult question, then pivot back to a preferred message. That may work for some corporate spokespeople. But skilled reporters recognize when someone is steering away from what was asked.
For a scientist, business executive, physician, union leader or executive director, credibility comes from answering the question. We prepare people to answer directly and in plain language, leave room for follow-up, and make their point without sounding scripted or evasive.
Every engagement is built around the interview, issue or decision in front of you, not a generic curriculum. We use a Messaging Pyramid to decide what the interview needs to accomplish: earn the quote, make the policy case, reach the right audience, prompt action, or respond to breaking coverage. Then we build the evidence and language the spokesperson can use naturally under questioning.
We review the issue, the coverage, the likely reporters, what gives the interview news value, and the questions they are most likely to press, not a generic list of media-training questions.
Recorded interviews run at real pace and length, followed immediately by playback. Spokespeople see where an answer became too long, too technical, evasive or less credible than intended.
A live television interview, a print conversation, a podcast, a panel and formal testimony reward different habits. We prepare for the one actually coming.
Scientists, physicians, attorneys, policy experts and executives often know too much to answer briefly. We help them decide what the audience needs first, and what can wait for the follow-up.
Each spokesperson leaves with specific habits to reinforce or change, so the next interview starts further ahead.
Built from the decision or story actually in play: a few core points, each answerable in the 10 to 20 seconds a broadcast gives you.
Including the questions nobody wants asked.
For leaders who will carry the argument in public.
Have an interview already on the calendar?
Book a CallFour phases. The durations reflect what this work actually takes.
Typically, about a week before the session. What is being asked, who is asking, what the coverage already says, and what this spokesperson has said publicly before. Anyone who trains you without reading your last three interviews is selling a template.
Half a day, usually two to four people. The material, the framing and the questions. This is conversation and drilling, not a lecture.
Two to three hours within the session. Recorded interviews at real length and real pace, played back immediately. Spokespeople usually recognize many of the habits they need to change as soon as they see the first playback.
Within three days. What worked, what did not, and the specific habits to reinforce or change. In writing, so the lessons survive the session.
For teams, each spokesperson gets individual practice and feedback rather than disappearing into a group workshop. It takes longer, but it is what changes the next interview.
Leaders need media training, but they are not always the people reporters want most.
The strongest interview may come from the scientist, physician, program lead or member closest to the issue. Their credibility is often the reason the interview matters, and the reason they need preparation before the camera turns on.
We train whoever is actually going to speak, at the level each person needs.
A Nobel laureate touring the United States risked being received as a symbolic figure rather than a voice on live American policy, and the tour meant a long run of interviews in different markets on different formats. The preparation was the work: framing each interview for accessibility and urgency, and holding the argument consistent across all of them so it landed the same way in the tenth as in the first.
Read the case study: Wangari Maathai
Physicians are credible on risk and are trained to speak to patients, not to a camera on deadline. Getting them ready to be frontline interpreters of risk, through the Fukushima Daiichi disaster among others, meant turning clinical and scientific material into consequences a general audience could hold onto, at interview speed. Environmental risk moved from technical debate to human consequence, carried by medical authority.
Read the case study: Physicians for Social ResponsibilityThat same preparation helped Union of Concerned Scientists experts become a regular presence in peak-season climate coverage rather than a one-time booking.
Someone who needs to be ready on camera?
Start a ConversationAric Caplan leads every stage of the training. For more than two decades, he has placed experts into interviews on policy, science, public health and environmental issues, and knows where reporters press, what they challenge, and what makes an answer usable.
Sessions run a half day or full day, for one spokesperson or a small team. Each person gets individual interview practice, playback and feedback.
Media training gets judged on the next interview, not on how the session felt. Did the spokesperson answer clearly? Did the reporter use the answer without changing its meaning?
Did the difficult question get a real answer, and did the coverage treat that answer as candor? Over time, the strongest test is whether the outlet comes back to the same person without being pitched.
A spokesperson who becomes someone reporters want to call again has been trained.
As a clinician scientist, having access to Aric Caplan's expertise has been invaluable. I have been particularly impressed by his grasp of complex medical issues and knowing how best to explain them to various audiences. He and his group have my highest recommendation.
Message preparation, on-camera practice with playback, difficult-question drills, and a written debrief. It is a working session built around your material, your likely questions, and the interviews you are preparing for. You leave with the recordings, written notes, and specific habits to work on. No laminated card of key messages.
It depends on the objective, the timeline, how many spokespeople are involved, and how intensive the preparation needs to be. The first conversation establishes what is actually needed.
Watch their next interview. A trained spokesperson answers the hard question directly, in plain language, and gets to the point without steering away from what was asked. The longer test: do reporters call them again?
Yes. We work through the questions an organization hopes will not come up: funding, past positions, internal disagreement, or an uncomfortable fact in the record. The goal is to answer plainly and move on, not deflect.
Whoever is likely to speak. That may be an executive director or board chair, but just as often it is a scientist, physician, program director, advocate, member, or other expert closest to the issue.
Ideally, before the interview request arrives. That gives us time to review the coverage, the spokesperson's public record, and the difficult questions likely to come. When the interview is already on the calendar, we prepare for the one actually coming.
If there is an interview, a hearing, or a launch on the calendar, the useful first step is a conversation about who is speaking and what they will be asked.
