Skip to main content

Conservation

National Wildlife Federation

Defending the Clean Water Act, public lands, and outdoor economies by reframing regulatory rollbacks as direct threats to water, access, and livelihoods.

Defending Clean Water, Public Lands, and Outdoor Economies Under Regulatory Pressure

A fly fisherman in waders casts his line on the Big Hole River, Montana, sunlit ripples reflecting gold across the water’s surface

At key moments of federal rollback and reinterpretation, core Clean Water Act protections for wetlands and streams, alongside safeguards for public lands and wildlife habitat, were at risk of being narrowed or removed. These changes carried immediate consequences not only for ecosystems, but for drinking water, outdoor access, and economies tied to hunting, fishing, and recreation.

Regulatory changes were framed as technical revisions, obscuring their real-world impact. The weakening of Clean Water Act jurisdiction, in particular, remained abstract to the public, limiting urgency and allowing consequential decisions affecting water quality, habitat, and access to proceed without sustained scrutiny.

Caplan Communications aligned communications directly with Clean Water Act rulemaking, legal challenges, and administrative review. We integrated earned media and rapid response into active policy defense, elevating hunters, anglers, and conservation leaders alongside legal and scientific experts. Messaging translated jurisdictional changes into clear consequences for streams, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and the communities and economies that depend on them.

The debate moved from technical rulemaking to a clear public understanding: weakening Clean Water Act protections directly affects water quality, wildlife habitat, and the ability to hunt, fish, and access public lands. Clean water was repositioned not as a regulatory abstraction, but as the foundation of ecosystems, economies, and outdoor traditions.

NWF strengthened its role as a national leader in defending the Clean Water Act and public lands, driving coverage that connected federal decisions to tangible impacts and reinforcing that protecting water is inseparable from protecting livelihoods, access, and long-term ecological stability.